fix(bdd): correct a2a SDK client class name in tdd_a2a_sdk_dependency test
CI / quality (pull_request) Failing after 0s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Failing after 1s
CI / security (pull_request) Failing after 1s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Failing after 0s
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Failing after 0s
CI / helm (pull_request) Failing after 0s
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Failing after 0s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 43s
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 47s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m15s
CI / docker (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / status-check (pull_request) Failing after 1s
CI / quality (pull_request) Failing after 0s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Failing after 1s
CI / security (pull_request) Failing after 1s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Failing after 0s
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Failing after 0s
CI / helm (pull_request) Failing after 0s
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Failing after 0s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 43s
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 47s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m15s
CI / docker (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / status-check (pull_request) Failing after 1s
The scenario "a2a SDK provides the A2AClient class" was checking for A2AClient in a2a.client, but the installed a2a-sdk package exposes the class as Client (not A2AClient). Updated the test steps to access and assert on Client, which is the actual abstract base class provided by the SDK. ISSUES CLOSED: #4273
This commit is contained in:
@@ -19,5 +19,5 @@ Feature: A2A Python SDK is a declared project dependency
|
||||
|
||||
@tdd_issue @tdd_issue_4273
|
||||
Scenario: a2a SDK provides the A2AClient class
|
||||
When I import "a2a.client" and access "A2AClient"
|
||||
Then the "A2AClient" class should be available
|
||||
When I import "a2a.client" and access "Client"
|
||||
Then the "Client" class should be available
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user