test(cli): add failing TDD test for session create silently suppressing facade dispatch exceptions

Added a new BDD feature file: features/tdd_session_create_suppress_exception.feature
Added step definitions: features/steps/tdd_session_create_suppress_exception_steps.py
The test captures bug #10414: session create uses contextlib.suppress(Exception) to silently discard ALL exceptions from _facade_dispatch() without any logging
The test is tagged @tdd_issue @tdd_issue_10414 @tdd_expected_fail per TDD workflow
The test FAILS before the fix (no logging currently) and the @tdd_expected_fail tag inverts it to a CI pass
The test will pass after the fix adds _log.warning(..., exc_info=True) inside the suppress block
Removed # type: ignore[import-untyped] suppressions from behave imports per project zero-tolerance policy

ISSUES CLOSED: #10414

features/steps/tdd_session_create_suppress_exception_steps.py

@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+"""Step definitions for tdd_session_create_suppress_exception.feature.
+
+This test captures bug #10414: ``session create`` in
+``src/cleveragents/cli/commands/session.py`` uses
+``contextlib.suppress(Exception)`` to silently discard ALL exceptions raised
+by ``_facade_dispatch()`` without any logging.  Programming errors,
+unexpected failures, and infrastructure issues in the facade dispatch are
+completely invisible.
+
+The scenario is tagged ``@tdd_expected_fail`` so the underlying assertion
+failure (confirming the bug exists) is inverted to a CI pass.  Once the
+fix for #10414 is merged, remove the ``@tdd_expected_fail`` tag from the
+feature file and this test will run normally as a regression guard.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import logging
+from unittest.mock import MagicMock, patch
+
+from behave import given, then, when
+from behave.runner import Context
+from typer.testing import CliRunner
+
+from cleveragents.cli.commands import session as session_mod
+from cleveragents.cli.commands.session import app as session_app
+from cleveragents.domain.models.core.session import Session
+
+# A distinctive error message to confirm the right exception was raised.
+_DISPATCH_ERROR_MESSAGE = "facade dispatch failed for tdd_10414"
+
+
+def _make_mock_session() -> MagicMock:
+    """Build a minimal mock Session object sufficient for the create command."""
+    mock_session = MagicMock(spec=Session)
+    mock_session.session_id = "01JTEST00000000000000000000"
+    mock_session.actor_name = None
+    mock_session.namespace = "default"
+    mock_session.message_count = 0
+    mock_session.created_at = __import__("datetime").datetime(2026, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0)
+    mock_session.updated_at = __import__("datetime").datetime(2026, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0)
+    return mock_session
+
+
+@given("a session create command with a mocked session service")
+def step_given_mocked_session_service(context: Context) -> None:
+    """Set up a CLI runner with a mocked session service.
+
+    The mock service returns a valid session so that the create command
+    proceeds past the service call and reaches the ``_facade_dispatch``
+    suppress block.
+    """
+    context.runner = CliRunner()
+
+    mock_service = MagicMock()
+    mock_service.create.return_value = _make_mock_session()
+
+    # Patch the module-level service so the CLI uses our mock.
+    context._orig_service = session_mod._service
+    session_mod._service = mock_service
+
+    def _cleanup() -> None:
+        session_mod._service = context._orig_service
+
+    context.add_cleanup(_cleanup)
+
+
+@given("the facade dispatch is patched to raise a RuntimeError")
+def step_given_facade_dispatch_raises(context: Context) -> None:
+    """Patch ``_facade_dispatch`` so it always raises a RuntimeError.
+
+    This simulates a real failure in the facade layer (e.g. the A2A
+    bootstrap is unavailable) and exercises the ``contextlib.suppress``
+    block in the ``create`` command.
+    """
+    context._facade_patcher = patch(
+        "cleveragents.cli.commands.session._facade_dispatch",
+        side_effect=RuntimeError(_DISPATCH_ERROR_MESSAGE),
+    )
+    context._facade_patcher.start()
+
+    def _cleanup() -> None:
+        context._facade_patcher.stop()
+
+    context.add_cleanup(_cleanup)
+
+
+@when("I invoke the session create command via the CLI runner")
+def step_when_invoke_create(context: Context) -> None:
+    """Invoke ``session create`` and capture log records during the call."""
+    # Capture WARNING-level log records from the session module logger.
+    session_logger = logging.getLogger("cleveragents.cli.commands.session")
+    handler = _CapturingHandler()
+    handler.setLevel(logging.WARNING)
+    session_logger.addHandler(handler)
+    session_logger.setLevel(logging.WARNING)
+
+    try:
+        context.result = context.runner.invoke(session_app, ["create"])
+    finally:
+        session_logger.removeHandler(handler)
+
+    context.captured_log_records = handler.records
+
+
+class _CapturingHandler(logging.Handler):
+    """A logging handler that stores all emitted records in a list."""
+
+    def __init__(self) -> None:
+        super().__init__()
+        self.records: list[logging.LogRecord] = []
+
+    def emit(self, record: logging.LogRecord) -> None:
+        self.records.append(record)
+
+
+@then("a WARNING log entry should have been emitted for the facade dispatch failure")
+def step_then_warning_logged(context: Context) -> None:
+    """Assert that a WARNING log entry was emitted when the facade dispatch raised.
+
+    Bug #10414: The ``contextlib.suppress(Exception)`` block in
+    ``session create`` does NOT log the suppressed exception.  This
+    assertion therefore FAILS while the bug exists, and the
+    ``@tdd_expected_fail`` tag causes CI to report the scenario as passed.
+
+    Once the fix is applied (adding ``_log.warning(..., exc_info=True)``
+    inside the suppress block), this assertion will pass and the
+    ``@tdd_expected_fail`` tag must be removed.
+    """
+    # The session create command should still succeed (non-fatal).
+    assert context.result.exit_code == 0, (
+        f"Expected session create to exit 0 even when facade dispatch fails, "
+        f"but got exit code {context.result.exit_code}.\n"
+        f"Output:\n{context.result.output}"
+    )
+
+    # Assert that a WARNING log record was emitted.
+    warning_records = [
+        r for r in context.captured_log_records if r.levelno >= logging.WARNING
+    ]
+    assert warning_records, (
+        f"Bug #10414: No WARNING log record was emitted when _facade_dispatch() "
+        f"raised a RuntimeError inside contextlib.suppress(). "
+        f"The exception was silently discarded with no logging. "
+        f"Captured records: {context.captured_log_records}"
+    )
+
+    # Assert the log record references the facade dispatch failure.
+    all_messages = " ".join(r.getMessage() for r in warning_records)
+    assert _DISPATCH_ERROR_MESSAGE in all_messages or any(
+        r.exc_info is not None for r in warning_records
+    ), (
+        f"Bug #10414: WARNING log record was found but did not contain the "
+        f"expected error message {_DISPATCH_ERROR_MESSAGE!r} or exc_info. "
+        f"Log messages: {all_messages!r}"
+    )

features/tdd_session_create_suppress_exception.feature

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+@tdd_issue @tdd_issue_10414
+Feature: TDD Issue #10414 — session create silently suppresses facade dispatch exceptions without logging
+  As a developer debugging a session creation failure
+  I want exceptions from _facade_dispatch() to be logged at WARNING level
+  So that I can diagnose why the facade layer failed without silent data loss
+
+  The ``session create`` command in
+  ``src/cleveragents/cli/commands/session.py`` (lines 199–205) uses
+  ``contextlib.suppress(Exception)`` to silently discard ALL exceptions
+  raised by ``_facade_dispatch()``.  There is no logging call before or
+  after the suppress block, making it impossible to diagnose failures in
+  the facade layer.
+
+  The fix must add a ``_log.warning(...)`` call (with ``exc_info=True``)
+  inside the suppress block so that the exception is recorded but the
+  session creation remains non-fatal.
+
+  The scenario below is tagged ``@tdd_expected_fail`` because the assertion
+  FAILS while the bug exists (no logging currently).  Once the fix is
+  merged, remove ``@tdd_expected_fail`` so the scenario runs as a
+  regression guard.
+
+  See CONTRIBUTING.md > Bug Fix Workflow > TDD Issue Test Tags.
+
+  @tdd_issue @tdd_issue_10414 @tdd_expected_fail
+  Scenario: Bug #10414 — session create logs a warning when facade dispatch raises
+    Given a session create command with a mocked session service
+    And the facade dispatch is patched to raise a RuntimeError
+    When I invoke the session create command via the CLI runner
+    Then a WARNING log entry should have been emitted for the facade dispatch failure