feat(agents): surface timeout budget in tool schemas and errors #82
Closed
opened 2026-07-30 15:30:16 +00:00 by CoreRasurae
·
0 comments
No Branch/Tag Specified
Labels
Clear labels
auto/blocked-by-deps
auto/ci-timeout
auto/claimed-implementer
auto/claimed-merge
auto/claimed-reviewer
auto/driver-down
auto/invariant-violation
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
Automation Tracking
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
auto/needs-implementer
auto/postmortem
auto/ready-to-merge
auto/restart-throttled
auto/revert
auto/sentinel
auto/stale-inactivity
auto/unstable
Blocked
Needs Feedback
Signed-off: Owner
Signed-off: Scrum Master
Signed-off: Tech Lead
Spike
PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.
Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.
Currently being processed by an implementer worker.
Currently being processed by the merge driver.
Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.
Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.
Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.
Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.
Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.
Failing CI needs implementer attention.
Documenting a driver incident or rollback.
Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.
Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.
Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.
Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.
No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.
Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.
Bounty
$100
A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$1000
A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$10000
A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$20
A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$2000
A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$250
A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$50
A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$500
A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$5000
A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$750
A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
MoSCoW
Could have
Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Must have
Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Should have
Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.
Points
1
1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
13
13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
2
2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
21
21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
3
3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
34
34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
5
5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
55
55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
8
8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
88
88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Priority
Backlog
This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet
Priority
CI Blocker
Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical
Priority
High
The priority is high
Priority
Low
The priority is low
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.
State
Completed
The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.
State
Duplicate
A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.
State
In Progress
A ticket that is actively being developed.
State
In Review
A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.
State
Paused
This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.
State
Unverified
All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.
State
Verified
The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.
State
Wont Do
This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.
Type
Automation
Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.
Type
Bug
Something that doesnt work as intended.
Type
Discussion
Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.
Type
Documentation
An error or improvement needed in the documentation.
Type
Epic
Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.
Type
Feature
Some new functionality not present.
Type
Legendary
A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.
Type
Refactor
A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.
Type
Support
Someone needs help using the project.
Type
Task
A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.
Type
Testing
Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
aditya (Aditya Chhabra)
aleenaumair (Aleena Umair)
brent.edwards (Brent Edwards)
CoreRasurae (Luis Mendes)
drew (Drew Morris)
eugen.thaci (Eugen Thaci)
freemo (Jeffrey Phillips Freeman)
HAL9000 (HAL 9000)
HAL9001 (HAL9001)
hamza.khyari (Hamza Khyari)
hurui200320 (Rui Hu)
justin.morris
khird (Kyle Hird)
org.cleveragents
Clear assignees
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Blocks
Depends on
#77 Epic: LLM Agent Runtime Stabilization — reliability, resource enforcement & correctness hardening
cleveragents/cleveractors-core
#84 feat(agents): surface timeout budget in tool schemas and errors
cleveragents/cleveractors-core
Reference: cleveragents/cleveractors-core#82
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Metadata
Background and context
The tool agent
timeoutconfig field (Actor Configuration Standard §4.5, default1second) bounds "the maximum execution time in seconds for any single tool invocation." Of the tools that actually enforce it today, only two do:cleveractors.agents.tool.ToolAgent._execute_shell_command(backing theshelltool) andcleveractors.agents.tool.ToolAgent._http_request_tool.The LLM-facing tool schemas sent to the model for function calling —
cleveractors.agents.llm_tools._BUILTIN_TOOL_SCHEMAS, bound viacleveractors.agents.llm_tools.normalize_tool_entryand consumed bycleveractors.agents.llm.LLMAgent— never mention this constraint. The LLM has no way to know, ahead of a call, thatshell/http_requestinvocations are time-boxed, or that the limit is adjustable via the agent'stimeoutconfig field. This is the same class of gap that ADR-2030 (D-4) already fixed forfile_readvs. shell commands: give the LLM an actionable signal instead of an opaque failure. We're missing the equivalent for timeouts.Separately, when a timeout does fire today, only the
shellpath names a number of seconds, and neither path names the config field that controls it.Current behavior
_BUILTIN_TOOL_SCHEMAS["shell"]and_BUILTIN_TOOL_SCHEMAS["http_request"](incleveractors.agents.llm_tools) describe only the functional arguments (command/args,url/method/headers/data) — neither mentions that the call is subject to an execution timeout.ToolAgent._execute_shell_commandraises:ExecutionError(f"Command '{command}' timed out after {self.timeout} seconds")— this names the elapsed seconds but never the
timeoutconfig field that controls it.ToolAgent._http_request_tooldoes not distinguish a timeout from any other request failure: the whole call is wrapped in a singleexcept Exception as e: raise ExecutionError(f"HTTP request failed: {e}"). The LLM sees a generic failure with no indication the cause was a timeout, let alone that atimeoutconfig field exists.Expected behavior
self.timeout(currentlyshellandhttp_request) has a schema description telling the LLM the call is bounded by a configurable execution timeout, so the model can factor that in (e.g. avoid issuing commands it can predict will run long).ExecutionErrormessage states both the number of seconds involved AND explicitly namestimeoutas the agent config field that controls it, so the model (or a human reading logs) knows what to adjust.ToolAgent._http_request_tooldistinguishes a request timeout from other request failures (connection errors, HTTP error statuses, etc.) instead of collapsing everything into one generic message.self.timeoutremains the sole config field (default1s, per §4.5); its default value and semantics are unchanged.Out of scope (noted for awareness, not addressed here):
ToolAgent._file_read_tooldoes not useself.timeoutat all today — the read is a plain synchronousopen()/.read()call with no timeout wrapping, even though §4.5 saystimeoutapplies to "any single tool invocation." That is a separate enforcement gap (not a schema/message gap) and is left for a follow-up issue if the project decides to pursue it.Acceptance criteria
_BUILTIN_TOOL_SCHEMAS["shell"]["description"]states that shell command execution is bounded by the agent's configuredtimeout(seconds)._BUILTIN_TOOL_SCHEMAS["http_request"]["description"]states that the request is bounded by the agent's configuredtimeout(seconds).ToolAgent._execute_shell_command's timeoutExecutionErrormessage explicitly namestimeoutas the adjustable agent config field, in addition to the elapsed seconds it already reports.ToolAgent._http_request_toolraises a distinctExecutionErroron request timeout (as opposed to other request failures) whose message states the configured timeout value and namestimeoutas the adjustable agent config field.ExecutionErrorwith their existing (non-timeout) message shape — behavior for non-timeout failures is unchanged.nox -s coverage_reportstays ≥ 97%.Supporting information
docs/index.md) — definestimeoutas "Maximum execution time in seconds for any single tool invocation."docs/adr/ADR-2030-tool-calling-spec-extensions.md— D-1 establishes_BUILTIN_TOOL_SCHEMASas LLM-facing hints (not part of the normative contract); D-4/D-6 establish the precedent of enriching error messages with actionable, self-correction guidance for the LLM. This issue extends both precedents to thetimeoutfield.a8f68b8:cleveractors.agents.llm_tools._BUILTIN_TOOL_SCHEMAScleveractors.agents.llm_tools.normalize_tool_entrycleveractors.agents.tool.ToolAgent._execute_shell_commandcleveractors.agents.tool.ToolAgent._shell_toolcleveractors.agents.tool.ToolAgent._http_request_toolcleveractors.agents.llm.LLMAgent(binds_lc_toolsfrom the schemas above; also readsself.config.get("timeout", 1)when constructing an internalToolAgentto dispatch a tool call)Subtasks
_BUILTIN_TOOL_SCHEMAS["shell"]and["http_request"]descriptions incleveractors.agents.llm_toolsto mention the configurable execution timeoutToolAgent._execute_shell_command's timeout error message to name thetimeoutconfig fieldToolAgent._http_request_toolto catch the request-timeout condition distinctly and raise anExecutionErrornaming thetimeoutconfig field and its configured valueshell/http_requestschema descriptions mention the timeout budgetExecutionErrormessage for both tools names thetimeoutconfig fieldDefinition of Done
This issue is complete when: