Invert default exception handling: stop swallowing by default; catch only recoverable exceptions and propagate the rest #78
Open
opened 2026-07-07 11:45:02 +00:00 by Graa
·
0 comments
No Branch/Tag Specified
Labels
Clear labels
auto/blocked-by-deps
auto/ci-timeout
auto/claimed-implementer
auto/claimed-merge
auto/claimed-reviewer
auto/driver-down
auto/invariant-violation
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
Automation Tracking
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
auto/needs-implementer
auto/postmortem
auto/ready-to-merge
auto/restart-throttled
auto/revert
auto/sentinel
auto/stale-inactivity
auto/unstable
Blocked
Needs Feedback
Signed-off: Owner
Signed-off: Scrum Master
Signed-off: Tech Lead
Spike
PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.
Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.
Currently being processed by an implementer worker.
Currently being processed by the merge driver.
Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.
Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.
Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.
Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.
Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.
Failing CI needs implementer attention.
Documenting a driver incident or rollback.
Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.
Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.
Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.
Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.
No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.
Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.
Bounty
$100
A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$1000
A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$10000
A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$20
A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$2000
A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$250
A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$50
A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$500
A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$5000
A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$750
A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
MoSCoW
Could have
Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Must have
Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Should have
Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.
Points
1
1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
13
13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
2
2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
21
21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
3
3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
34
34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
5
5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
55
55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
8
8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
88
88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Priority
Backlog
This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet
Priority
CI Blocker
Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical
Priority
High
The priority is high
Priority
Low
The priority is low
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.
State
Completed
The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.
State
Duplicate
A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.
State
In Progress
A ticket that is actively being developed.
State
In Review
A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.
State
Paused
This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.
State
Unverified
All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.
State
Verified
The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.
State
Wont Do
This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.
Type
Automation
Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.
Type
Bug
Something that doesnt work as intended.
Type
Discussion
Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.
Type
Documentation
An error or improvement needed in the documentation.
Type
Epic
Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.
Type
Feature
Some new functionality not present.
Type
Legendary
A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.
Type
Refactor
A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.
Type
Support
Someone needs help using the project.
Type
Task
A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.
Type
Testing
Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
aditya (Aditya Chhabra)
aleenaumair (Aleena Umair)
brent.edwards (Brent Edwards)
CoreRasurae (Luis Mendes)
drew (Drew Morris)
eugen.thaci (Eugen Thaci)
freemo (Jeffrey Phillips Freeman)
HAL9000 (HAL 9000)
HAL9001 (HAL9001)
hamza.khyari (Hamza Khyari)
hurui200320 (Rui Hu)
justin.morris
khird (Kyle Hird)
org.cleveragents
Clear assignees
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: cleveragents/cleveractors-core#78
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Description
The library's default exception-handling posture is inverted. Across the runtime, the prevailing pattern is a broad
except Exceptionthat catches everything and neutralizes it — logging and continuing, converting the error into a string that is injected into graph state as if it were a valid response, or returning an{"error": ...}dict that a downstream caller silently discards. Swallowing is the default; propagation is the exception.This is backwards. The correct posture is the opposite:
Catching should be an explicit, whitelisted decision per recovery path — not a blanket catch-all that masks bugs, network failures, budget breaches, and programming errors alike.
Current behavior (evidence)
There are ~101 broad
except Exception/ bare-exceptsites insrc/. The problematic ones don't just log-and-reraise — they catch-all and neutralize. Representative swallow-and-continue sites:langgraph/nodes.py:409(Node._execute_agent) — catches all exceptions and doesagent_response = f"Error processing message: {str(e)}", injecting the error text into graph state as a legitimate agent response.langgraph/nodes.py:231(Node.execute) — catch-all returns{"error": str(e), "failed_node": self.name}, which_execute_from_nodethen silently drops (falls back to the original input message).langgraph/pure_graph.py:988, and further broad catches at531,1265,1273,1608,1899,2058,2374,2380.langgraph/bridge.py—235,256,389,410,516,648.agents/tool.py—244,493,537,577,896,907;agents/llm.py—714,1308,1466,1587,1748;agents/base.py:88,agents/factory.py:294,agents/llm_client.py:102.The codebase already acknowledges this as an anti-pattern — the module docstring of
_safe_node_token_intinlanggraph/nodes.pyexplicitly notes that an escaping error would "be caught byNode.execute()'s broadexcept Exception, and silently discard the LLM response." The defensive helper exists precisely to route around the catch-all, which is a symptom of the inverted default rather than a fix for it.Root cause
The default is "catch everything, keep going." A genuine error (a bug, an unreachable provider, a budget breach, a malformed config) is indistinguishable at the catch site from a recoverable, expected condition, so all of them are absorbed. Failures become invisible: the graph proceeds with the original input or an error-string masquerading as output.
Proposed fix (policy)
Invert the default to an allowlist model:
core/exceptions.py(CleverAgentsException→ConfigurationError,ExecutionError(kind, reason),RoutingError,TemplateError,ApplicationError,MissingUsageMetadataError,StreamRoutingError, …), so narrowing is feasible today with no new infrastructure.# pylint: disable=broad-exception-caughtat many sites; flip the posture by keepingbroad-exception-caughtenabled and requiring per-site justification, so new catch-alls are caught in review.Definition of Done
except Exception/ bare-exceptinsrc/is either (a) narrowed to a specific recoverable type, or (b) retained at a justified boundary that logs and re-raises/surfaces a typed error — none convert an exception into success-shaped output.{"error": ...}dict into graph state / response content in place of propagating a typed error.broad-exception-caughtis enforced by lint; remaining broad catches carry an inline justification.Relationship to other issues
nodes.py:409→nodes.py:231→pure_graph.py:988) is exactly the pattern this ticket generalizes. #71's fix should conform to the policy defined here.fix(runtime): … proper error propagation) — fixed specificruntime.py/_execute_llmsites (wrong error type, no cleanup). This ticket extends the same principle across the whole runtime as a default posture rather than one-off fixes.Non-conflict with specs / ADRs
This does not contradict any spec or ADR:
ExecutionError(kind="timeout")to propagate once retries are exhausted — the current swallow behavior actively violates its intent.core/exceptions.pytaxonomy is the intended vehicle for typed propagation; this ticket makes the runtime use it as designed.Proposed Branch
fix/error-handling-allowlist-no-default-swallowProposed Commit Title