feat(credentials): refactor LLMAgent/AgentFactory for per-request credential injection and extended provider routing #20
Merged
hurui200320
merged 1 commits from 2026-06-08 11:21:03 +00:00
feature/credential-injection into master
No Reviewers
Labels
Clear labels
auto/blocked-by-deps
auto/ci-timeout
auto/claimed-implementer
auto/claimed-merge
auto/claimed-reviewer
auto/driver-down
auto/invariant-violation
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
Automation Tracking
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
auto/needs-implementer
auto/postmortem
auto/ready-to-merge
auto/restart-throttled
auto/revert
auto/sentinel
auto/stale-inactivity
auto/unstable
Blocked
Needs Feedback
Signed-off: Owner
Signed-off: Scrum Master
Signed-off: Tech Lead
Spike
PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.
Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.
Currently being processed by an implementer worker.
Currently being processed by the merge driver.
Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.
Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.
Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.
Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.
Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.
Failing CI needs implementer attention.
Documenting a driver incident or rollback.
Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.
Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.
Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.
Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.
No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.
Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.
Bounty
$100
A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$1000
A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$10000
A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$20
A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$2000
A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$250
A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$50
A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$500
A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$5000
A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$750
A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
MoSCoW
Could have
Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Must have
Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Should have
Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.
Points
1
1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
13
13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
2
2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
21
21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
3
3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
34
34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
5
5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
55
55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
8
8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
88
88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Priority
Backlog
This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet
Priority
CI Blocker
Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical
Priority
High
The priority is high
Priority
Low
The priority is low
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.
State
Completed
The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.
State
Duplicate
A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.
State
In Progress
A ticket that is actively being developed.
State
In Review
A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.
State
Paused
This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.
State
Unverified
All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.
State
Verified
The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.
State
Wont Do
This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.
Type
Automation
Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.
Type
Bug
Something that doesnt work as intended.
Type
Discussion
Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.
Type
Documentation
An error or improvement needed in the documentation.
Type
Epic
Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.
Type
Feature
Some new functionality not present.
Type
Legendary
A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.
Type
Refactor
A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.
Type
Support
Someone needs help using the project.
Type
Task
A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.
Type
Testing
Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.
No Label
Type
Feature
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
aditya (Aditya Chhabra)
aleenaumair (Aleena Umair)
brent.edwards (Brent Edwards)
CoreRasurae (Luis Mendes)
drew (Drew Morris)
eugen.thaci (Eugen Thaci)
freemo (Jeffrey Phillips Freeman)
HAL9000 (HAL 9000)
HAL9001 (HAL9001)
hamza.khyari (Hamza Khyari)
hurui200320 (Rui Hu)
justin.morris
khird (Kyle Hird)
org.cleveragents
Clear assignees
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Blocks
#12 feat(credentials): refactor LLMAgent/AgentFactory for per-request credential injection and extended provider routing
cleveragents/cleveractors-core
Reference: cleveragents/cleveractors-core#20
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Delete Branch "feature/credential-injection"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Implements Wave 3 of the cleveractors-core integration (ADR-2026, ADR-2028).
Closes #12
Summary
Refactors
LLMAgentandAgentFactoryto support per-request credential injection. The factory now extracts the provider-specific credential slice from the credentials dict (matching AC2) and passes it as a flatdict[str, str] | NonetoLLMAgent.LLMAgentstores the provider-specific credentials and passes them tobuild_chat_modelfor lazy client construction.Key Changes
AgentFactory
credentials: dict[str, dict[str, str]] | Noneparameter stored asself.credentials_create_agent_instancenow extractscredentials[provider]and passes the provider-specific slice toLLMAgentConfigurationErrorwhen credentials is not None but provider key is absent (AC4 compliance)ReactiveAgentFactorybackward-compatibility alias documented as submodule-only (not re-exported fromcleveractors.__init__)LLMAgent
credentials: dict[str, str] | None(provider-specific slice from factory)validate_credentials_structurecallchat_modelproperty (deferred to first access)_KNOWN_CLIENT_ATTRSpromoted toClassVarfor cleanup client discovery, with explicit provider coverage notes (ChatOpenAI, ChatAnthropic, ChatGoogleGenerativeAI)chat_modelgetter return type narrowed toBaseChatModelwith explicit None guardcredentialsproperty exposingself._credentialscleanup()acquires_chat_model_lockbefore reading_chat_modeland iterating clients (prevents double-close on concurrent calls — n4)temperature_overridetype validation inprocess_messageprocess_message()andcleanup()carry explicit concurrency-constraint docstring warnings (M5)Executor (runtime.py)
credentialsparameter changed todict[str, dict[str, str]] | Nonein bothExecutor.__init__andcreate_executor— standalone mode no longer requires passing{}(m4)_execute_graphusescopy.deepcopy(self.config)instead of shallow copy to prevent AgentFactory from mutating nested dicts (m5 / ADR-2026 AC8)from/toedge field fallbacks (aligns withvalidate_dict())_execute_llmSSRF Prevention (ADR-2028)
_validate_base_urlnow returns canonicalized URL with lowercased hostname and lowercased schemelocalhostcheck to prevent homograph bypasses likeℓocalhost(m7)%character in decoded hostname rejected to close IPv6 zone-ID bypass (n3)_check_known_provider_domainremovedllm_client.py (
_build_standalone)api_key: raisesConfigurationError("'api_key' must be a string, got <type>")immediately before the env-var fallback, preventing the misleading "Missing API key" error (m6)llm_providers.py (
validate_credentials_structure)LLMAgent.__init__as a caller (m2)llm.py module docstring
LLMAgentreceives a flat provider-specific credential slice, and that the provider-keyed lookup is performed byAgentFactory(m1)llm_imports.py
lazy_import_langchain→populate_langchain_globals(semantically accurate)CHANGELOG.md
ReactiveAgentFactoryalias entry moved from### Changedto### Added(m3)Tests
AgentFactory.create_agents_from_config()credential threadingQuality Gates
nox -e lintnox -e typechecknox -e unit_testsnox -e integration_testsPre-existing Issues (not addressed in this PR)
91378529d7tofd361b38fafd361b38fatoffa7faff2bffa7faff2bto390ac75e3b390ac75e3btod0727a4d90d0727a4d90toe76345219ae76345219ato64988fccfe64988fccfeto0201f8bfe70201f8bfe7toab0ea12fceab0ea12fceto24ba92c37124ba92c371to2fd363fbe32fd363fbe3to438bc21f00438bc21f00tode1f7b09ccde1f7b09ccto17c485c21817c485c218toda8448820dda8448820dtof7aa076f9df7aa076f9dto0dd490cd3b0dd490cd3btoa48d137c63a48d137c63toc7a733dcf4c7a733dcf4toed9a479f35ed9a479f35to2050363b7e2050363b7etob8c3585d49b8c3585d49to6dc684497c6dc684497cto858ffccebb858ffccebbto4801892e254801892e25to61b90c6b1b61b90c6b1btoca9bde13a6ca9bde13a6tob1f34f1714b1f34f1714to8f6df3687a8f6df3687ato336297e6ef336297e6efto49938a530649938a5306tof281fa3b24Sanity-Check Review (src/ only)
Ticket Requirements (Issue #12) — All 9 ACs covered ✅
AgentFactoryacceptscredentialsparamfactory.py.__init__credentials[provider]slice forLLMAgentfactory.py._create_agent_instanceLLMAgentlazy-inits chat modelllm.py._ensure_chat_model+_chat_model_lockConfigurationErrorwhen provider key missing from credentialsfactory.pymissing-key guardcredentials=Nonellm_client._build_standaloneChatOpenAI(base_url=...)llm_client._build_from_credentialsopenai_compatibletreated identically_NATIVE_PROVIDERS, falls through to non-native pathconfig_dictnever mutateddeepcopyin_execute_graph;setdefaulton a shallow copy in_execute_llmWill merging break anything?
Short answer: No, not for well-formed inputs.
There are three behavioural changes — all intentional improvements, not regressions:
a. Edge field
"from"/"to"fallback removed (runtime.py)Old code silently tolerated legacy
from/tokeys. New code does a hardedge_def["source"]lookup. Only affects callers constructingroutedicts manually while bypassing the schema validator; any config that passedvalidate_dict()already usessource/targetand is unaffected.b. Unknown composite-agent references now raise
AgentCreationError(factory.py)Previously a missing agent in a composite was silently skipped, producing silently broken behaviour at runtime. Now it fails immediately with a clear error. Correctness fix.
c.
create_executorcredentials type tightenedChanged from required
dict[str, Any]to optionaldict[str, dict[str, str]] | None(defaultNone).validate_credentials_structurerejects non-string credential values. Existing well-formed callers are unaffected; callers passing{"openai": {"api_key": 123}}would now get aConfigurationErrorinstead of a misleading downstream failure.Key implementation correctness notes
api_keyresolution:api_keynested underconfig_dict["config"]["api_key"]reaches_build_standalone; a top-levelconfig_dict["api_key"]does not — but this matches the old code's behaviour exactly, so no regression.BaseChatModelannotation: Only imported underTYPE_CHECKING;from __future__ import annotationsmakes all annotations strings at runtime — noNameError. ✅populate_langchain_globalslocking: threading lock (not asyncio), called from sync__init__, guarded section is pure dict assignment. No deadlock risk with_chat_model_lock. ✅cleanup()lock ordering: acquires lock, collects clients, sets_chat_model = None, then releases lock before awaitingclose()— correct, prevents holding a thread lock across async I/O. ✅finally: readsself._chat_modeldirectly (bypasses the property getter) and guards withis not Noneto handle the case wherecleanup()ran concurrently. ✅Verdict: Safe to merge ✅
All 9 ACs from issue #12 are delivered. The three behavioural changes are all improvements (fail-fast instead of silent-wrong). No production regression risk for callers using the public API with valid inputs.
The 3 previously failing BDD scenarios (
runtime_coverage.feature:29,:51,:72) have been fixed in the same commit — wrongunittest.mock.patchtargets after imports were moved to module level, plus a stale legacy edge-key in the test fixture.