Files

2.1 KiB

Testing Patterns

Overview

Testing patterns provide structured approaches to writing reliable, maintainable, and expressive tests. They address common challenges: isolating units under test, structuring test logic clearly, managing complex test data, and abstracting UI interactions for end-to-end tests.

Pattern Comparison

Pattern Purpose Scope Key Benefit
Test Doubles Replace real dependencies with controlled substitutes Unit / Integration Isolation from external systems
Arrange-Act-Assert Structure each test in three clear phases Unit / Integration Readability and consistency
Given-When-Then Express tests as BDD scenarios Acceptance / BDD Business-readable specifications
Page Object Encapsulate UI page structure behind an API UI / E2E Decouple tests from page layout
Test Data Builder Construct complex test fixtures fluently Unit / Integration Reduce boilerplate, improve clarity

When to Use Which

  • Need to isolate a unit from its dependencies? Use Test Doubles (mock, stub, spy, fake, dummy).
  • Want a simple, consistent test layout? Use Arrange-Act-Assert for any unit or integration test.
  • Writing acceptance tests with stakeholders? Use Given-When-Then for natural-language scenarios.
  • Testing web UIs that change layout frequently? Use Page Object to centralise selectors.
  • Creating many similar but slightly different test objects? Use Test Data Builder for fluent construction.

Relationships Between Patterns

  • Arrange-Act-Assert and Given-When-Then are structural alternatives; AAA is more common in unit tests, GWT in BDD.
  • Test Doubles are used inside the "Arrange" / "Given" phase of either structure.
  • Test Data Builder simplifies the "Arrange" / "Given" phase when fixtures are complex.
  • Page Object is typically combined with AAA or GWT for UI tests.

Further Reading

  • xUnit Test Patterns by Gerard Meszaros
  • Growing Object-Oriented Software, Guided by Tests by Freeman & Pryce
  • Martin Fowler's "Mocks Aren't Stubs" article