Files
temp/features/tdd_event_bus_exception_swallow.feature
hurui200320 1878998b7a refactor(testing): rename tdd_bug/tdd_bug_N tags to tdd_issue/tdd_issue_N
Rename the TDD tag system from tdd_bug/tdd_bug_<N> to tdd_issue/tdd_issue_<N>
across the entire codebase. The tdd_expected_fail tag is unchanged.

The TDD expected-failure workflow is not limited to bug fixes — it applies
equally to any issue type (features, tasks, refactors). The _bug suffix was
misleading and narrowed the perceived scope. The new _issue suffix accurately
reflects that the TDD tagging system applies to any Forgejo issue.

Changes span 92 files:
- features/environment.py: validate_tdd_tags(), should_invert_result(), and
  apply_tdd_inversion() updated — regex, variables, error messages
- robot/tdd_expected_fail_listener.py: _validate_tdd_tags(), _should_invert_result(),
  start_test(), end_test() updated consistently
- 33 Behave .feature files: all @tdd_bug/@tdd_bug_<N> tags renamed
- 29 Robot .robot files: all tdd_bug/tdd_bug_<N> tags renamed
- 3 Robot fixture files renamed (tdd_bug_alone, tdd_missing_tdd_bug,
  tdd_expected_fail_missing_bug_n) with content and references updated
- Tag validation tests and helpers updated (function names, command dispatch
  keys, output strings, fixture references)
- CONTRIBUTING.md: section renamed from 'TDD Bug Test Tags' to
  'TDD Issue Test Tags', all tag references and examples updated
- noxfile.py: comment references updated
- Step definition files, mock helpers, and benchmark files: docstring
  references updated

ISSUES CLOSED: #965
2026-03-27 05:58:35 +00:00

32 lines
1.6 KiB
Gherkin

@tdd_issue @tdd_issue_988
Feature: TDD Issue #988 — ReactiveEventBus.emit() swallows exception details
As a developer debugging a subscriber failure
I want the exception handler in ReactiveEventBus.emit() to log the full
exception message and traceback
So that I can diagnose why a subscriber failed without guessing
This test captures bug #988. The exception handler in
ReactiveEventBus.emit() currently logs only `type(exc).__name__`
(e.g. "ValueError") without `str(exc)` or `exc_info=True`. When a
subscriber raises, the log contains no diagnostic detail no message,
no traceback, no clue about which input or state caused the failure.
The traceback scenario uses `@tdd_expected_fail` because that
assertion still FAILS while the bug exists. The tag inversion
mechanism causes CI to report that scenario as passed. Once the
fix for #988 is merged, the `@tdd_expected_fail` tag must be
removed so both scenarios run normally.
See CONTRIBUTING.md > Bug Fix Workflow > TDD Issue Test Tags.
Scenario: Bug #988 — emit() logs exception message when handler raises
Given a ReactiveEventBus with a handler that raises a ValueError
When I emit an event that triggers the failing handler
Then the warning log should contain the exception message text
@tdd_expected_fail
Scenario: Bug #988 — emit() logs traceback via exc_info when handler raises
Given a ReactiveEventBus with a handler that raises a ValueError
When I emit an event that triggers the failing handler
Then the warning log should contain traceback information