Rename the TDD tag system from tdd_bug/tdd_bug_<N> to tdd_issue/tdd_issue_<N>
across the entire codebase. The tdd_expected_fail tag is unchanged.
The TDD expected-failure workflow is not limited to bug fixes — it applies
equally to any issue type (features, tasks, refactors). The _bug suffix was
misleading and narrowed the perceived scope. The new _issue suffix accurately
reflects that the TDD tagging system applies to any Forgejo issue.
Changes span 92 files:
- features/environment.py: validate_tdd_tags(), should_invert_result(), and
apply_tdd_inversion() updated — regex, variables, error messages
- robot/tdd_expected_fail_listener.py: _validate_tdd_tags(), _should_invert_result(),
start_test(), end_test() updated consistently
- 33 Behave .feature files: all @tdd_bug/@tdd_bug_<N> tags renamed
- 29 Robot .robot files: all tdd_bug/tdd_bug_<N> tags renamed
- 3 Robot fixture files renamed (tdd_bug_alone, tdd_missing_tdd_bug,
tdd_expected_fail_missing_bug_n) with content and references updated
- Tag validation tests and helpers updated (function names, command dispatch
keys, output strings, fixture references)
- CONTRIBUTING.md: section renamed from 'TDD Bug Test Tags' to
'TDD Issue Test Tags', all tag references and examples updated
- noxfile.py: comment references updated
- Step definition files, mock helpers, and benchmark files: docstring
references updated
ISSUES CLOSED: #965
This branch contains the fix for bug #592 (actor name slash sanitisation).
The TDD tests from PR #655 are tagged @tdd_expected_fail which expects
the bug to be present, but since the fix is on this branch the tests
pass unexpectedly, causing CI failures.
Remove the @tdd_expected_fail tags from both Behave and Robot test files
so the tests run as normal regression tests alongside the fix.
ISSUES CLOSED: #592
Behave BDD scenarios (3) tagged @tdd_bug @tdd_bug_592 @tdd_expected_fail
exercise the real ActorRegistry._actor_name() code path with a provider
whose default model contains '/' separators. The tests assert correct
behaviour (exit 0, single-slash names, valid JSON) and fail while the
bug is present; the @tdd_expected_fail handler inverts results so CI
stays green.
Includes Robot Framework integration smoke tests (3), ASV benchmarks (3),
and a shared FakeProviderInfo/FakeProviderRegistry mock in
features/mocks/fake_provider.py.
ISSUES CLOSED: #634
freemo
hurui200320
brent.edwards